Go to HealthTreks Home




Note: Going home clears all of these panels.

Synchronize panels by clicking the panel directional buttons found at the top of the panel.

Synchronize panels by clicking the panel directional buttons found at the top of the panel.

Synchronize panels by clicking the panel directional buttons found at the top of the panel.

Synchronize panels by clicking the panel directional buttons found at the top of the panel.


Get
2007 OSR9019P1- Patient-reported quality measures

M and E Calculation View

Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Output Calculator

Introduction
This tool tracks monitoring and evaluation indicators for output uris. Up to 20 new M and E indicators can be added for each output. Indicator labels are used to identify the same indicator in different calculators (use WBSs for the labels).

Calculation View Description
Sample health care treatment cost used in a tutorial. v172b

Version: 0.9.8

Feedback About urbandelivery/output/2007 OSR9019P1- Patient-reported quality measures/2141223446/none

Step 1 of 3. Make Selections

M and E Indicators

Indicator 1

Indicator 2

Indicator 3

Indicator 4

Indicator 5

Indicator 6

Indicator 7

Indicator 8

Indicator 9

Indicator 10

Step 2 of 3. Enter M and E Indicators

Relations

Use In Descendants?
Overwrite Descendants?

More M and E Indicators

Indicator 11

Indicator 12

Indicator 13

Indicator 14

Indicator 15

Indicator 16

Indicator 17

Indicator 18

Indicator 19

Indicator 20

Step 3 of 3. Save

Method 1. Do you wish to save step 2's calculations? These calculations are viewed by opening this particular calculator addin.

Instructions

Step 1

  • Step 1. Indicators: Up to 10 indicators can be entered in this step and up to 10 indicators can be included in the next step.
  • Step 1. Indicator Name and Description: Name and description for each indicator.
  • Step 1. Indicator Label: Labels are used to group together benchmark, target and actual indicators. DevTreks recommends using a WBS to classify the indicators.
  • Step 1. Target Type: The Benchmark option is used to define a baseline, or benchmark, indicator. The Actual option is used to define the actual results for an indicator. The Full Target and Partial Target options are used to carry out progress and goal-related analyses.
  • Step 1. Indicator Alternative: This property is used to compare up to five indicators. Refer to the M and E Analysis references.
  • Step 1. Indicator Date: Make sure that the benchmark, targets, actual, indicators have distinct dates.
  • Step 1. Indicator Type: If the indicator is a benefit or cost (i.e. substitute inputs), enter the price type. Additional options include demographic, natural resource, and socioeconomic indicator types.
  • Step 1. Indicator Weight: A multiplier used in weighted milestone calculations. The Total will be multiplied by this value. Use the description to explain further.
  • Step 1. Quantity 1 and 2: Fill in an amount and unit for at least Quantity 1. Fill in Quantity 2 when two quantities are needed to derive a total for the indicator. For example, a substitute input would derive a total cost by including a price for Quantity 1, a quantity for Quantity 2, and a Math Type of Q1_multiply_Q2. A rate can be derived by filling in both Quantities and then specifying Q1_divide_Q2. Use the description field to further explain.
  • Step 1. Indicator Total and Unit: The Unit must be manually entered. The Total will be calculated from the Q1Amount, MathType, and Q2Amount properties. For example, a substitute input would derive a total cost by including a price for Quantity 1, a quantity for Quantity 2, and a Math Type of Q1_multiply_Q2.

Step 2

  • Step 2. Use Same Calculator Pack In Descendants?: True to insert or update this same calculator in children.
  • Step 2. Overwrite Descendants?: True to insert or update all of the attributes of this same calculator in all children. False only updates children attributes that are controlled by the developer of this calculator (i.e. version, stylehsheet name, relatedcalculatorstype ...)
  • Step 2. What If Tag Name: Instructional videos explaining the use of what-if scenario calculations should be viewed before changing or using this parameter.
  • Step 2. Related Calculators Type: When the Use Same Calculator Pack in Descendant is true, uses this value to determine which descendant calculator to update. Inserts a new descendant when no descendant has this same name. Updates the descendant that has this same name.
  • Step 2. Indicators: Up to 10 indicators can be included in this step.

References

  • International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Project/programme monitoring and evaluation (MandE) guide. 2011. (www.ifcr.org)
  • International Institute for Educational Planning Manual for Monitoring and Evaluating Education Partnerships. UNESCO 2009. (www.iiep.unesco.org)
  • US Government Accountability Office Applied Research and Methods. GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide. Best Practices for Developing and Managing Capital Program Costs. March, 2009.
  • United Nations Development Programme Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results. 2009

Current view of document
DevTreks -social budgeting that improves lives and livelihoods
Output Group
DRG469- Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity
Output
2007 OSR9019P1- Patient-reported quality measures
Indicator Type Target Type Alternative Weight Date Math Type Amount 1 Unit 1 Amount 2 Unit 2
Indicator 1: HCAHPS Full Target Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 benchmark none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : This one time survey asks patients to answer 27 questions about their satisfaction with the hospital care they received. The threshold established for patient satisfaction is a rating of 75.
Indicator 2: HCAHPSl Target Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 05/30/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : Since this survey is only taken one time per hospital stay, the benchmark target and the partial target are identical.
Indicator 3: HCAHPS Actual Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 70.000 rating
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 70.000 rating 0.000
Description : This is a summary of the final score from the patient survey.
Indicator 4: Hip replacement benchmark quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 benchmark none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the benchmark score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS). The benchmark reflects the without treatment condition.
Indicator 5: Hip replacement Q1 target quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 90.000 rating
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 08/29/2007 none 90.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the Q1 target score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS).
Indicator 6: Hip replacement Q1 actual quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 85.000 rating
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 85.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the actual Q1 score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS).
Output Series: 2007 OSR9019P1- Patient-reported quality measures
Indicator Type Target Type Alternative Weight Date Math Type Amount 1 Unit 1 Amount 2 Unit 2
Indicator 1: HCAHPS Full Target Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 benchmark none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : This one time survey asks patients to answer 27 questions about their satisfaction with the hospital care they received. The threshold established for patient satisfaction is a rating of 75.
Indicator 2: HCAHPSl Target Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 05/30/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : Since this survey is only taken one time per hospital stay, the benchmark target and the partial target are identical.
Indicator 3: HCAHPS Actual Satisfaction Rating OSR9019P1A
Totals: 70.000 rating
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 70.000 rating 0.000
Description : This is a summary of the final score from the patient survey.
Indicator 4: Hip replacement benchmark quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 75.000 rating
econ1 benchmark none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 75.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the benchmark score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS). The benchmark reflects the without treatment condition.
Indicator 5: Hip replacement Q1 target quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 90.000 rating
econ1 partialtarget none 1.000 08/29/2007 none 90.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the Q1 target score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS).
Indicator 6: Hip replacement Q1 actual quality rating OSR9019P1B
Totals: 85.000 rating
econ1 actual none 1.000 05/29/2007 none 85.000 rating 0.000
Description : This rating reflects the actual Q1 score for a quarterly patient survey completed using a health quality rating for hip replacements (i.e. Harris, Oxford, CMS).
Dataset: 2007 OSR9019P1- Patient-reported quality measures IRI Benefits are defined using ME indicators summarized from patient reported satisfaction surveys.









Uploading a new file will replace any existing file. If necessary, please package and download the existing file prior to this action. If the file has been uploaded successfully, this page will refresh and show the new file information. If the file can't be uploaded (i.e. exceeds 60MB, unsupported mimetype, bad xml, bad html) this page will refresh and show the existing file information.

The file has been uploaded.